What I’m Reading and Thinking About This Week

What a week.  Ugh.  Here are the things I’ve been reading and thinking about this time around.

How Many White People Does it Take to Ruin a Good Joke? (The New Republic)

Jazmin Hughes is pretty amazing, and this piece examining the ins and outs of comedy and race is really excellent and insightful.  In it, Hughes examines the prevalence of jokes about white people made by people of color–largely seen as a way to seek solace from the frustrations of being a marginalized person in a culture of white supremacy–being co-opted by white people themselves:

This is how the party endswith white people wanting in on the joke so badly that they create a separate category of “cool” white people who mock their own whiteness in an effort at solidarity. “White people be like ‘white people be like,’ but they be the white people that white people be like!!!!” as one Tumblr post neatly summarized.

Hughes examines the historical context of jokes like this and finds that they go back a long way.  She also talks about how the most successful comedy is always “punching up,” which means that comedians don’t make jokes at the expense of people they have more privilege than.  She points out one of the most troubling aspects of white people making jokes about white people:

But what most white-people jokes have in common is that they are not about white people per se. Instead, they are about inequalities between whites and other races. “What is the scariest thing about a white person in prison?” a comedian asks. “You know he did it.” Har har! Except you only got the punchline because you’re aware of the problem of prejudicial prosecutions. In sum: “LOL, RACISM.”

It’s a great read and not super long.  Well worth your time.

How Fifty Shades of Grey Does Money (The Billfold)

After a couple of interesting conversations with one of my long-distance friends about Fifty Shades of Grey, E.L. James being kind of an asshole, and the impact on the world of BDSM, my friend sent me this excellent, funny piece from the Billfold this week.  It is both a send-up of the controversies surrounding the franchise as well as a smart little take on marketing and capitalism:

“Okay, but that’s really unsafe,” I say. “Do you think you have a responsiblity for educating people on safe and consensual ways of exploring BDSM together?”

“I’m just a book,” Fifty Shades says. “A story. When do stories need to be responsible for anything but themselves?”

At any rate, it’s smart and funny.

All Dating Advice is as Terrible as the People Who Give it (The Guardian)

The title pretty much says it all, and I don’t have much to add here.  But it is an interesting look at the culture we live in and perpetuate where dating advice nearly always mirrors our own experiences (because validation):

Everyone has ulterior motives. There’s a good chance that anybody emitting romantic tips is a deeply insecure life-choice evangelist – that they’ve chosen some path (to marry young, or to wait, to have children, to stay single, etc) and they’re not sure it was right. Their uncertainty manifests itself as a desperate attempt to persuade you that it’s the best choice for you, too.

The article runs down the other types of advice-givers, including the ones who wish they had chosen differently, the ones who are cynical (they’re most likely to quote The Rules or whatever bullshit else there is), etc.  But the fact remains there’s no such thing as perfect advice, there is no right way to do these things, and one size does not even fit most.

The Lesbian Jewish Leftist Conspiracy Tearing Apart Reddit, Untangled (Gawker)

First of all, this:

Almost overnight, the venture-backed link-sharing behemoth has been plunged into a bizarre, wide-ranging conspiracy scare—complete with accusations of shady cabals, corruption, radical feminist infiltration, and scheming of all sorts—that makes PrisonPlanet.com look like BuzzFeed. It is one of the least sane things I have read on this internet, and I’ve spent the last day trying to untangle it.

I don’t have the energy to get into all of the politics and crazy at play here, but the basic idea is that Reddit is being infiltrated by feminist social justice warriors and the white men are clutching their metaphorical pearls (or their actual balls, because the feminist SJWs are coming for those, too, probably) over this.  What is usually relegated to the fringes of the site (although the site does have racism and sexism problems overall, and I say that as a regular user of it) is seeping into the mainstream, and that is why it is noteworthy.  It’s still batshit insane, but it is worth taking note of, because:

There was a time when the fringe truly existed on the fringes of society, where they could be insulated from the non-fringe and egg each other on into new and more brazen forms of fringedom. But today, conspiracies as manifestly deranged as this one rocket in popularity, empowered by the simple software behind sites like Reddit and 8chan. There have always and will always be right-wing lunatics who think creeping “transexual feminism” is an existential threat; but now those same people share real estate with all the rest of us. They are just one click away.

I don’t know.  I am simultaneously amused by the irrational fear of the white hegemony at Reddit, but I’m also alarmed at how pervasive and insidious this kind of thinking can be.

What got you reading and thinking this week?

 

What I’m Reading and Thinking About this Week

These are the things that got me reading and thinking this week.  Without further ado:

Punch-Drunk Jonathan Chait (Gawker)

If you’re on the internet and run in academic circles, you’ve probably read or at least seen mention of oppressed white dude Jonathan Chait’s piece about the problem of political correctness and policing language.  Chait’s piece is super long and blows a lot of hot air, but my biggest problem with it is that his one good point gets lost in all his concern trolling.  I’m not linking to his piece because why bother, but I did really appreciate Alex Pareene’s response over at Gawker:

But the destruction of the magazine industry and the growth of the open-forum internet have amplified formerly marginal voices. Now, in other words, writers of color can be just as condescending and dismissive of Chait as he always was toward the left. And he hates it.

And this:

Excessive speech-policing by overzealous campus activists certainly happens. But Chait is wildly exaggerating the threat it poses—calling it a “philosophical threat” to liberalism, instead of a minor annoyance people like Chait have to deal with in the brief period just before they officially assume their positions in America’s power elite.

Chait is so very sad.  Someone get the man the tiniest violin they can find.

Angela’s Ashes (The Hairpin)

Mostly about shows like My So-Called Life that were cut down before their time, this is an excellent piece about television, nostalgia, and more.

Over the next 18 episodes, we lived My So-Called Life by proxy, parsing every lingering exchange, every painfully awkward faux-pas, every elbow-bruising, shearling-swaddled boiler-room makeout session between Angela and Jordan Catalano (to this day, the single greatest contribution Jared Leto has made to humankind—pace 30 Seconds to Mars fans), with manic zeal. Today, I can still recite from memory lines like: “People are always saying you should be yourself, like ‘yourself’ is this definite thing, like a toaster.”

But the piece is also about the fever with which a show’s fans will fight for it:

This is the reasoning, I reckon, that fuels the feverish, breathless crusades that spring up, season after season, to preserve programs on the verge of cancellation. These days, there’s nothing a TV fan fights harder for than to keep his show alive.

At any rate, it examines some of my favorite shows (and some shows I never grew to love), and it’s worth a read for anyone who has lost a show too soon.

Entitlement is Infecting Us with the Measels (Dame Magazine)

I’m at the point where the mere mention of an anti-vaccination LUNATIC throws me into an apoplectic rage.  I’m working on it.  In the meantime, the anti-vaxxers continue to be the most dangerous, entitled pieces of shit out there.  This article focuses on the recent outbreak in California, and it is worth reading:

This is what I find the most troubling: the notion that a small but very vocal minority of anti-vaccine activists have managed to sow so much confusion that kids are being put at risk. With its appeals to natural health and individual autonomy, vaccine wariness is as trendy as anything else you’ll find in the Whole Foods aisle (gluten bad! chia good!), but its impact is so much greater.

But also, this:

And then there’s the deeper question—beyond the pseudo-science, the mistrust of authority, the faddishness—of just what we feel we owe one another in the society. The thing I’ve found most disturbing about the hard-core anti-vaccine arguments is the way they center on the rights of the individual parent to make choices for his or her child, ignoring (most immediately) the rights of that child as well as the collective rights and health of the community.

This is as privileged and short-sighted as it gets, and it makes my physically angry.

What got you reading and thinking this week?

 

What I’m Reading and Thinking About this Week

After a week or two off, here are the things I’ve been reading and thinking about on the internet this week!

The Paradoxical Rise of the Viral Marriage Proposal (Buzzfeed)

This is a really excellent, really thoughtful piece about the spectacle culture of marriage and heterosexual love, and also about the wedding industrial complex and how social media plays into all of this.  What’s especially remarkable about the rise of the viral marriage proposal is the fact that the popularity of marriage is actually on decline among young heterosexual people in America. Quite the paradox, and this article has all kinds of things to think about and unpack:

This sense of ubiquity — everyone is having engagement photos taken! — creates a perception that this kind of public performance is necessary, a standard part of the ever-expanding process of getting married. The combination of new social media and the decades-old American urge to keep up with the Joneses has been a boon for the wedding industrial complex, and professional photographers are profiting from the new perception that this costly but once-rare part of the marriage ritual is expected.

Perhaps this is all of interest to me because I’m in a committed long-term relationship with a man who I am not married to and have no current plans to marry.  Neither one of us wants a wedding at all, and yet we are surrounded by people who are getting engaged, getting married, and literally posting every detail on every kind of social media outlet available to them.

But I digress.  In the article, Angyal also brings up a point that has long bothered me about all of this spectacle proposal stuff, too:

…there’s something unsettling about all this performing, and it’s not just that a man surprising a woman with a public proposal — and that’s almost always how it goes — places her under an enormous amount of pressure to say yes…Indeed, watching some of these public proposal videos, it seems that the men are not so much proposing to women as at them.

But that’s probably my ultra-feminism acting up or whatever.  At any rate, it’s a great article and well worth a read.

Ayn Rand’s Sweet Valley High (The Toast)

It’s basically what I’ve been waiting for my entire life.  Mallory Ortberg is often very funny and this piece helps illustrate that:

“I told him we didn’t want to miss a single minute of mall time. I mean, what’s better than spending an evening at the mall? That’s where money lives.”

“Money is only a tool, Lila,” Jessica reminded her friend. “It will take you wherever you wish, but it will not replace you as the driver of your lime-green Triumph, complete with car phone.”

It’s just really funny writing.

Every Conversation on the Internet with Dudes, Ever (Medium)

Humorous but also sadly true, this article takes a tongue-in-cheek look at how dudes derail conversations about women, sexism, and feminism on the internet, all day every day.  A sample:

Woman: There’s still a long way to go to achieve equality.
Dude: Not true! A woman was mean to me once.
Woman: That’s not what —
Dude: SO MEAN

I actually saw an exchange exactly like this happen on one of my favorite sites the other day.  TOO REAL.

Most Anticipated Books of 2015 (The Millions)

This is just a really excellent round-up of books being published this year, complete with descriptions and links to read more.  I added so many books to my TBR pile.  Out of control!

What did you read that got you thinking this week?

What I’m Reading and Thinking About this Week

These are the things I’ve been reading and thinking about this week.  Without further preamble:

Unarmed People of Color Killed by Police, 1999-2014 (Gawker)

I mean, the title of this piece sort of says it all, doesn’t it?  It’s upsetting but absolutely worth your time to scroll.

Getting to ‘No’ (NY Times)

Susan Dominus’s essay in the NYT magazine this week is well worth a read, not only because it’s powerful and extremely well-written, but because it tackles all sorts of important things about sexual assault and rape culture.  In it, she reflects on one of her own college experiences with a red cup, hazy memories, and lingering feelings of anger with no language to describe what had happened to her:

The language we use for a given experience inevitably defines how we feel about it. I could not land on language that felt right — to me —about that encounter. I still cannot.

She talks about how hard it can be to use the right language, even when the horrible thing is happening:

No” and “stop” — of course, they should be said and respected. But several women who told me they felt their consent was ambiguous said that in the moment, they froze, and language eluded them altogether: They said nothing. Because those words are inherently confrontational, they can require a degree of strength that someone who is feeling pressured or confused or is just losing her nerve or changing her mind might not have.

Go read it.  This is required reading this week.

The Economics of Dating, OK Cupid Edition (The Billfold)

Kind of bleak, but also very funny, this piece sort of tackles the idea of who you can actually find on an online dating site, from a purely numbers viewpoint:

I tried Tinder first, 100% because of the “you can’t message each other until both of you opt in” feature. Swiped through everyone in about two weeks, and every week or so I swipe through the handful of people who just joined. There’s nothing quite like looking at the screen that reads “there is no one new around you” and interpreting it as “sorry, we tried everyone we had, guess you will never find love.”

Then she turned to OKC and found that even though she lives in a city (Seattle) with a preponderance of eligible men, she still didn’t want to date many (or any) of them:

But from an economic perspective, it’s fascinating to see how I look at all of this not as an array of wonderful possibilities, but as a scarcity of options. It’s like when you’re shopping for a coat on Amazon; you have this vision of what you hope you’ll find, and then you see that there are only 10 coats in your price range, and suddenly you don’t want any of them.

“Best of 2014″ in YA Fiction List Breakdown (Stacked)

Every year, Kelly Jensen does this great breakdown of what the books on the best of lists look like.  She takes a look at author gender, books featuring male or female protagonists, who is a debut author and who isn’t, and so forth.  It takes a tremendous amount of time on her part and is always valuable and fascinating.

What I’m Reading and Thinking About This Week

These are the things I’ve been reading and thinking about this week.  Woo hoo.

Why I Can’t Wait to be a Fat Bride (The Guardian)

I’ve written before about how Lindy West is sort of “polarizing” or whatever, but that’s actually my nice way of saying that misogynists hate her?  Whatever, I like Lindy West.  This piece in the Guardian was all around excellent.  In it, she tackles the “issue” (and here I use the word facetiously because the only “issue” here is that people are the fucking worst) of her being fat and her fiance being a conventionally attractive, thin man.  It’s powerful stuff:

And now we’re getting married. Now I’m not just a fat girlfriend – I’m a fat bride-to-be. (As though being a feminist bride wasn’t contradictory enough.) And, it turns out, that feels like a lot of responsibility.

It’s not a very long piece, but it’s got lots to unpack and think about.  What West is talking about–a fat woman marrying a thin man–is still seen as a radical act. Which is fucking insanity.

None  of this is New: An Oral History of Fanfiction (The Mary Sue)

It’s an interesting and thoughtful look at the history of fanfiction, as well as attempting to determine where the origins of the act of writing fanfiction come from.  Mostly, I just like this line:

Then I remember that not everyone spends as much time on the internet as I do, and I calm down.

It sums up my whole life.

2014 Was the Year Men Finally Got Feminism (Mother Jones)

We’ve been talking about feminism a lot in our house lately.  I mean, I talk about it a lot, anyway, because I’m an “ultra feminist” or whatever, but it’s been a topic of discussion a lot between J. and me.  We’ve been talking about what it means to be a man and a feminist, what it means to be a “real” feminist, why it’s so important to identify as one today, etc. etc.  So this article struck a chord with me:

The arrival of the guys signifies a sea change, part of an extraordinary year for feminism, in which the conversation has been transformed, as have some crucial laws, while new voices and constituencies joined in. There have always been men who agreed on the importance of those women’s issues, and some who spoke up, but never in such numbers or with such effect. And we need them. So consider this a watershed year for feminism.

I’m not sure how much new stuff there is here for people who are already clued into what’s happening, but it’s nice to see an article recognizing that more men are doing the work necessary to examine the movement, etc etc.  Also, this:

Feminism needs men. For one thing, the men who hate and despise women will be changed, if they change, by a culture in which doing horrible things to, or saying horrible things about, women will undermine rather than enhance a man’s standing with other men.

It’s a good read and a strong primer for anyone who wants to dip their feet into what it all means.

What got you reading and thinking this week?

 

What I’m Reading and Thinking About This Week

Here’s the stuff that got me thinking this week! Yay!

What Do You Really Mean When You Say “Basic Bitch”? (NY Mag)

This phrase is everywhere these days, and whenever I hear it, I get a little uncomfortable.  I’ve had several conversations about it recently, and while I don’t feel like I ever fully articulate my feelings on it, I was happy to come across this article this week:

Basic, according to the BuzzFeed quizzes and CollegeHumor videos that wrested the term from the hip-hop world and brought it into the realm of white-girl-on-white-girl insults, means someone who owns things like Uggs and North Face and leggings…The basic bitch — as she’s sometimes called because it’s funnier when things alliterate, and because you’re considered a poor sport if you don’t find it funny — is almost always a she.

It’s a pretty great read, and it tackles a lot of the issues I have with the way the phrase is thrown around (It describes someone’s consumption habits without actually condemning consumption? It’s a way to rag on girls and not seem as mean?) while still managing to be smarter and more articulate than I am:

And so the woman who calls another woman basic ends up implicitly endorsing two things she probably wouldn’t sign up for if they were spelled out for her: a male hierarchy of culture, and the belief that the self is an essentially surface-level formation.

And that, right there, is my biggest problem with it.

 Roxane (The New Inquiry)

“All Roxane Gay, all the time” is a thing I wrote to my mom in an email this week, and I’m proving that by linking to this great article about my current internet obsession.  It’s worth a read whether you’re familiar with Gay’s work or not, and it deftly tackles feminism, pop culture, race, and the intersection of all these things.

In addition to dismantling the myth of the BLACK ♀, Gay is a crossover success in various ways—respected by critics and mainstream consumers at the same time, in the academy but not necessarily of it, appealing to white feminists while offering the kind of nuanced description of a black woman’s life that so many of us seek.

In addition to dismantling the myth of the BLACK ♀, Gay is a crossover success in various ways—respected by critics and mainstream consumers at the same time, in the academy but not necessarily of it, appealing to white feminists while offering the kind of nuanced description of a black woman’s life that so many of us seek.

Like in Gay’s work, there’s some good, hard stuff to unpack here.

Abortion: Not Easy, Not Sorry (Elle)

I mean, the title sort of encapsulates the entire article’s thesis: why are women fed a message that they should regret their abortions (and if they don’t, the implied message is that there is something wrong with them as a result).  Partly a discussion of a new book by The Nation’s Katha Pollit called Pro: Reclaiming Abortion Rights, part a personal essay on the part of the author, Laurie Abraham writes:

For a small segment of women—and the number is small, by any reasonably scientific account—abortion is indeed a tragedy, a trauma with long-lasting reverberations. But I want to tell a different story, the more common yet strangely hidden one, which is that I don’t feel guilty and tortured about my abortion. Or rather, my abortions. There, I said it.

She also talks about how living in the “abortion-is-murder” media frenzy–even as a pro-choice person–means you forget actual facts and that your perspective is altered.  It’s a fascinating read, and it’s also very long, so be prepared for that–but it’s absolutely necessary and important reading.

#GamerGate: Is their Hashtag Really More Important than Women’s Lives? (Pajiba)

GamerGate is a difficult topic to follow along with, especially if you aren’t already ensconced in the gaming world, but that doesn’t mean it’s not important to at least know the basics of what is happening.  Because it speaks to a larger, more disturbing issue that permeates every part of the online world.  This piece over at Pajiba addresses a lot of things and frames it in a very accessible way (there’s a very succinct summary that will get you up to speed in about a paragraph).

The problem is, as Courtney Enlow states, that this is not about gaming, nor is it about journalistic ethics (which makes absolutely NO SENSE if you think about what is happening for a second).  It’s about a hatred and fear of women, and it is fucking terrifying.  Enlow makes a plea to those of us who are not directly involved with the gaming community:

There will be no getting through to the violent, terrible individuals making the threats against these women in the industry and the men who dare defend them. So, I appeal to you, the moderate middle of the movement and those on the fray who, like me, were unsure of the goings on. This movement, this falsely ethical witch hunt, it has nothing to offer you. Do not pretend, do not lie to yourself — this is not about ethical reporting. This is about putting women in their place, and apparently that place is the ground.

I encourage you to read more about what is happening and why it’s happening.  Deadspin has a pretty good rundown, too.

What got you reading and thinking this week?

What I’m Reading and Thinking About This Week

Time for another round up of the things I’m reading and thinking about this week.  Basically everything is terrible and this is not helped by the fact that I’m facing down a weekend full of obligations.  So here we go!

Gone Girl is the Most Feminist Mainstream Movie in Years (Vox)

Todd VanDerWerff is one of my favorite movie and TV critics writing on the internet these days, but this piece about the Gone Girl movie is an absolute must-read.  There are a ton of think pieces about the film right now: is it misogynistic? feminist? anti-feminist? full of misandry?   VanDerWerff argues it’s inherently feminist, and although I have had mixed feelings about it, he’s got me more than half-convinced:

But open up Gone Girl and dig around in its guts, and you find something surprising. This is perhaps the most feminist mainstream movie in years, a forthright depiction of the ways that society controls women and forces them into certain roles, then lets men basically do whatever they want. Amy Dunne might be a monster, but she’s no sui generis psychopath. No, she’s Frankenstein’s monster, stitched together by a husband, parents, and a social order that demanded she be certain things, rather than who she really was.

I mean, obviously there are spoilers in this review, but if you have seen it or read the book or don’t care about spoilers (I fall into this third category, and J. says I’m a monster because of it) it’s so worth your time to sink into this article.  Fincher doesn’t have the best track record with women in his films (add him to a very long list, yeah?), but this film might mark a departure for him.

The Price of Black Ambition (VQ Magazine)

At this point, Roxane Gay is my imaginary best friend because she’s so amazing.  This piece does nothing to dissuade that opinion (and if you haven’t read her recaps of Starz’s Outlander series over at NY Mag, go do that and I will wait).  But this piece is EXCELLENT and IMPORTANT:

Many people of color living in this country can likely relate to the onset of outsized ambition at too young an age, an ambition fueled by the sense, often confirmed by ignorance, of being a second-class citizen and needing to claw your way toward equal consideration and some semblance of respect. Many people of color, like me, remember the moment that first began to shape their ambition and what that moment felt like.

This whole essay is amazing.  If you read one thing this week, read this.  I could quote the entire thing:

Like many students of color, I spent a frustrating amount of time educating white people, my professors included, about their ignorance, or gritting my teeth when I did not have the energy. When race entered class discussions, all eyes turned to me as the expert on blackness or the designated spokesperson for my people. When racist “jokes” were made, I was supposed to either grin and bear it or turn the awkward incident into a teachable moment about difference, tolerance, and humor. When a doctoral classmate, who didn’t realize I was in hearing range, told a group of our peers I was clearly the affirmative-action student, I had to pretend I felt nothing when no one contradicted her. Unfortunately, these anecdotes are dreadfully common, banal even, for people of color. Lest you think this is ancient history, I graduated with my Ph.D. in December 2010.

Important stuff. Read it.  READ IT.

Stories Like Passwords (The Hairpin)

Everything I’ve read that’s written by Emma Healey has been excellent (so I should probably get to the galley of her book I have, right?) and this essay is no different.  It’s about power, and gender dynamics, and it’s incredibly powerful.  After she shows some other female writers at a writers-colony emails from a male colleague that have made Healey feel vaguely uncomfortable, the other women open up  with their own stories:

If you listen to enough stories like this, you’ll start to hear a few themes. These men are not ever that big of a deal. What they do to us is never really that bad in the grand scheme of things, no matter how big it feels at the time. It could always have been much worse. We might just have been misreading the situation. They might not have meant anything by it. They’ve never apologized – but then again, we’ve never asked them to.

This fits nicely into what I’ve been thinking about this week, which is about consent and power, about the insidiousness of sexism, of rape culture, of how important it is to open dialogues, to keep talking.  The entire thing is incredibly disturbing and incredibly powerful:

An abusive relationship is a closed loop. So is a professional network. So is the patriarchy.

Healey talks about an experience as a student with a much older professor.  Of how, after that relationship ended, he attacked her in her apartment one night.  She talks about how sharing this story opened the floodgates of dozens of stories just like hers:

Without exception, every single one of these men is still working—writing, publishing, editing, teaching—today.

These men do not work, or live, or act in a vacuum. Unless they are masterminds or psychopaths (and they cannot all be), their behavior, or aspects of it, is often visible. These men are everywhere.

It’s about the tacit approval we give these men.  It’s about how we are failing women.  It’s going to stay with me for a long time.

On Deciding What Counts: Elizabeth Ellen and What Makes a Victim (The Toast

Keeping up with the theme of really complex essays about hard stuff, here’s another one!.  If you aren’t reading The Toast at least periodically, I encourage you to do so.  If you are, let’s talk about it! This week, I corresponded (in a very long and passionate email chain) with a friend about this piece, about Mallory Ortberg and her brain (I wish to live in it), and about the prickly issues at play here.  This piece is so good.

The piece is a response to Elizabeth Ellen’s “Open Letter to the Internet” (so edgy!) about the allegations Sophia Katz made about a magazine editor named Stephen Tully Dierks, and also about the allegations of statutory rape made against writer Tao Lin.  That summary barely scratches the surface of what Ellen’s bizarre essay tackles, though.  Ortberg writes:

And yet, I think that anyone who is willing to publicly Monday-morning-quarterback the details of another woman’s rape must be prepared to face criticism, and to be brave about it…It is one thing to wish to have a public conversation about passive and active forms of consent, about how to deal with regrettable sex after one has had it, about how to best take care of oneself after being sexually assaulted; it is another to publicly pick apart the details of someone else’s rape. One can do it, of course! But it is thorny and painful territory. Best to go prepared.

What follows is a detailed and excellent critique of the arguments Ellen is trying (and failing) to make about consent.  Ortberg nears the end of her essay with this:

Not every argument is worth having! And yet, I think, it is important to gently but firmly point out that this is a wrong-headed and a dangerous and a profoundly unkind argument to make. It is shot through with the worst and the laziest sort of empathy. It prioritizes the avoidance of pain and criticism over honesty. It confuses public criticism with dehumanization. It confuses the victimized with the victimizer.

Please go read it and think about it.

What got you thinking this week?